---
schema: 1
type: video
title: 'Build AI Systems for Discernment, Not Approval - Angel Ortmann Lee, Duolingo'
description: >-
  The human-in-the-loop paradigm promises automation's efficiency without
  sacrificing safety or nuance. But it hides an underexamined assumption: that
  human involvement produces genuine discernment, not just a rubber stamp. In
  practice, human-AI interaction often occurs in environments where throughput
  or business incentives crowd out critical thinking. This talk examines why
  human oversight so often falls short in practice, and how deliberate
  interaction design can close the gap. We've grown comfortable delegating
  reasoning to machines. We follow GPS down unfamiliar streets and accept AI
  coding suggestions with minimal inspection. When Shaw & Nave (Wharton, 2026)
  studied human-AI interaction, they found people accepted AI answers over 80%
  of the time, even when it was wrong. They call this cognitive surrender: when
  humans forgo deliberation and adopt AI output with minimal scrutiny. At the
  Duolingo English Test, a controlled experiment revealed that experienced
  proctors shown fabricated AI cheating alerts confirmed cheating at near-chance
  rates. But coin-flip accuracy is unacceptable when college admissions and
  visas are on the line. The model wasn't the problem, the signals were fake.
  But skilled reviewers were still showing systematic confirmation bias. A
  single change to decision framing improved accurate rejections by 21%. The fix
  isn't better models or more human oversight. It's engineering the interaction
  itself. What reasoning patterns do you need from the human, and how does the
  interface elicit them? This talk covers practical design principles for
  building AI systems that improve human judgment, produce more reliable review
  behavior, and generate higher-quality training data. Every AI system trains
  its users, the question is whether you're doing it deliberately. Speakers: -
  Angel Ortmann Lee (Duolingo): Angel is a Software Engineer at Duolingo,
  building AI security systems for the Duolingo English Test to help ensure
  online testing is secure, trustworthy, and accessible for learners around the
  world. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/angel-ortmann-lee-7494b9201 ---
  Watch along with the corrected transcript, summary, timestamps and resources
  on this talk's official AIE page:
  https://ai.engineer/talks/CDqzWpwkSls-build-ai-systems-for-discernment-not-approval-angel-ortmann-lee-duolingo
  Join our upcoming AI Engineer conferences (see https://ai.engineer landing
  page): - AIEi Shanghai, November 5–6 — the first for meeting top Chinese labs
  and engineers - AIE CODE in SF, November 10–12 — the top AI Coding conference
  returns - AIEi Sydney, December 7–8 — the first AIEi run alongside NeurIPS
  2026 in Sydney ---
canonical: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls'
markdown: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls.md'
llms: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls/llms.txt'
parent: 'https://liquidgold.cc/channel/aidotengineer.md'
channel: aidotengineer
updated: '2026-10-24T08:33:04.260Z'
language: null
children: []
videoId: CDqzWpwkSls
durationSeconds: 1553
publishedAt: '2026-07-07T23:31:51.000Z'
searchChunks:
  - ordinal: 0
    text: null
    startSeconds: 12
    endSeconds: 111
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=12'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 1
    text: null
    startSeconds: 12
    endSeconds: 111
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=12'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 2
    text: null
    startSeconds: 122
    endSeconds: 203
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=122'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 3
    text: null
    startSeconds: 122
    endSeconds: 203
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=122'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 4
    text: null
    startSeconds: 214
    endSeconds: 293
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=214'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 5
    text: null
    startSeconds: 214
    endSeconds: 293
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=214'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 6
    text: null
    startSeconds: 304
    endSeconds: 418
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=304'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 7
    text: null
    startSeconds: 430
    endSeconds: 509
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=430'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 8
    text: null
    startSeconds: 520
    endSeconds: 634
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=520'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 9
    text: null
    startSeconds: 646
    endSeconds: 724
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=646'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 10
    text: null
    startSeconds: 735
    endSeconds: 855
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=735'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 11
    text: null
    startSeconds: 735
    endSeconds: 855
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=735'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 12
    text: null
    startSeconds: 975
    endSeconds: 1074
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=975'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 13
    text: null
    startSeconds: 1085
    endSeconds: 1192
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=1085'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 14
    text: null
    startSeconds: 1085
    endSeconds: 1192
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=1085'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 15
    text: null
    startSeconds: 1203
    endSeconds: 1314
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=1203'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 16
    text: null
    startSeconds: 1203
    endSeconds: 1314
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=1203'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 17
    text: null
    startSeconds: 1314
    endSeconds: 1326
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=1314'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 18
    text: null
    startSeconds: 1314
    endSeconds: 1326
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=1314'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 19
    text: null
    startSeconds: 1326
    endSeconds: 1420
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=1326'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 20
    text: null
    startSeconds: 1430
    endSeconds: 1553
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=1430'
    heldReason: rights
  - ordinal: 21
    text: null
    startSeconds: 1430
    endSeconds: 1553
    watch: 'https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls?t=1430'
    heldReason: rights
---


# Build AI Systems for Discernment, Not Approval - Angel Ortmann Lee, Duolingo

The human-in-the-loop paradigm promises automation's efficiency without sacrificing safety or nuance. But it hides an underexamined assumption: that human involvement produces genuine discernment, not just a rubber stamp. In practice, human-AI interaction often occurs in environments where throughput or business incentives crowd out critical thinking. This talk examines why human oversight so often falls short in practice, and how deliberate interaction design can close the gap. We've grown comfortable delegating reasoning to machines. We follow GPS down unfamiliar streets and accept AI coding suggestions with minimal inspection. When Shaw & Nave (Wharton, 2026) studied human-AI interaction, they found people accepted AI answers over 80% of the time, even when it was wrong. They call this cognitive surrender: when humans forgo deliberation and adopt AI output with minimal scrutiny. At the Duolingo English Test, a controlled experiment revealed that experienced proctors shown fabricated AI cheating alerts confirmed cheating at near-chance rates. But coin-flip accuracy is unacceptable when college admissions and visas are on the line. The model wasn't the problem, the signals were fake. But skilled reviewers were still showing systematic confirmation bias. A single change to decision framing improved accurate rejections by 21%. The fix isn't better models or more human oversight. It's engineering the interaction itself. What reasoning patterns do you need from the human, and how does the interface elicit them? This talk covers practical design principles for building AI systems that improve human judgment, produce more reliable review behavior, and generate higher-quality training data. Every AI system trains its users, the question is whether you're doing it deliberately. Speakers: - Angel Ortmann Lee (Duolingo): Angel is a Software Engineer at Duolingo, building AI security systems for the Duolingo English Test to help ensure online testing is secure, trustworthy, and accessible for learners around the world. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/angel-ortmann-lee-7494b9201 --- Watch along with the corrected transcript, summary, timestamps and resources on this talk's official AIE page: https://ai.engineer/talks/CDqzWpwkSls-build-ai-systems-for-discernment-not-approval-angel-ortmann-lee-duolingo Join our upcoming AI Engineer conferences (see https://ai.engineer landing page): - AIEi Shanghai, November 5–6 — the first for meeting top Chinese labs and engineers - AIE CODE in SF, November 10–12 — the top AI Coding conference returns - AIEi Sydney, December 7–8 — the first AIEi run alongside NeurIPS 2026 in Sydney ---

Canonical: https://liquidgold.cc/watch/CDqzWpwkSls · Channel: [AI Engineer](https://liquidgold.cc/channel/aidotengineer.md)

> Search chunk text is held until public-source provenance is verified.

## Document chunks

> Missing: no stored document chunks are available.
