After Automation
What this entry covers
After Automation is a piece by Dan Shipper of Every, discussed at length in the channel's video How to Stay Employable in the Age of Agents, where Every's COO Brandon Gau interviews Shipper about it [^dCmOTURRf1Y@50].
How it is used in the material
The discussion of After Automation is framed as a live debate: interviewer and author openly disagree about whether the picture the piece paints reflects the future in 5 or 10 years [^dCmOTURRf1Y@50]. The broader argument it sits within is optimistic about employability — the message is that if you just ride the models, you're going to be fine [^dCmOTURRf1Y@10], and that agents evolving makes an ambitious life more possible, for more people, not fewer [^dCmOTURRf1Y@10].
Connecting idea
A recurring claim in the same material is that AI agents lose value when they drift from humans — the further an agent gets from a person, the less valuable it is [^dCmOTURRf1Y@0]. This is the backdrop against which the After Automation conversation explores what work looks like when agents do more of it.
- After Automation is Dan Shipper's piece from Every, explored in an interview with Brandon Gau [^dCmOTURRf1Y@50].- The piece is treated as a debate about timing: does it describe the world in 5 years or 10?- It connects to the argument that agents staying close to humans retain the most value [^dCmOTURRf1Y@0].